wulaw  
image image image image image
image
Modern Data (1946 - 2017) Legacy Data (1791 - 1945) Analysis Results
Analysis Case Detail
Analysis Specifications Analysis Outcome
Unit of Analysis n/a
Analysis Case Count 106 (of 7,367 possible records)
Relevant Scope 1954 - 1966
Using Data Release SCDB_2009_03
Search Reference Code 0903-TIETACK-4785
Analysis
Overview
Issues
Summary
Frequency
Distributions
Crosstab
Reports
Case
Details
         
Supreme Court Detail
Case Name
KING v. UNITED STATES
LEXIS | Westlaw | FindLaw | CourtListener
Note: FindLaw and CourtListener are free services.
Date Decision December 12, 1966
Date Argument October 13, 1966
Decision Type opinion of the court (orally argued)
Citations 385 U.S. 293
87 S. Ct. 408
1966 U.S. LEXIS 2778
17 L. Ed. 2d 374
Docket 35

Lower Court Detail
Court in which Case Originated Tennessee Middle U.S. District Court
Court whose Decision was Reviewed U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Petitioner person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
Respondent United States

Vote Detail
Issue/Legal Provision
(1 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Search And Seizure (other Than As Pertains To Vehicles Or Crime Control Act)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Fourth Amendment
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas
Issue/Legal Provision
(2 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Self-incrimination (other Than As Pertains To Miranda Or Immunity From Prosecution)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination)
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas
Issue/Legal Provision
(3 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Self-incrimination (other Than As Pertains To Miranda Or Immunity From Prosecution)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination)
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas
Issue/Legal Provision
(4 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Self-incrimination (other Than As Pertains To Miranda Or Immunity From Prosecution)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination)
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas
Issue/Legal Provision
(5 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Self-incrimination (other Than As Pertains To Miranda Or Immunity From Prosecution)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination)
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas
Issue/Legal Provision
(6 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Right To Counsel (cf. Indigents Appointment Of Counsel Or Inadequate Representation)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas
Issue/Legal Provision
(7 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Right To Counsel (cf. Indigents Appointment Of Counsel Or Inadequate Representation)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas
Issue/Legal Provision
(8 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Right To Counsel (cf. Indigents Appointment Of Counsel Or Inadequate Representation)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas
Issue/Legal Provision
(9 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Right To Counsel (cf. Indigents Appointment Of Counsel Or Inadequate Representation)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas
Issue/Legal Provision
(10 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Confrontation (right To Confront Accuser, Call And Cross-examine Witnesses)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Sixth Amendment (right to confront and cross-examine, compulsory process)
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas
Issue/Legal Provision
(11 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Confrontation (right To Confront Accuser, Call And Cross-examine Witnesses)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Sixth Amendment (right to confront and cross-examine, compulsory process)
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas
Issue/Legal Provision
(12 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Confrontation (right To Confront Accuser, Call And Cross-examine Witnesses)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Sixth Amendment (right to confront and cross-examine, compulsory process)
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas
Issue/Legal Provision
(13 of 13)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Confrontation (right To Confront Accuser, Call And Cross-examine Witnesses)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Sixth Amendment (right to confront and cross-examine, compulsory process)
Vote Coalition 4 - 1
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Harlan
Brennan
Stewart
dissent
Warren
jurisdictional dissent
Douglas
Clark
justice did not participate
White
Fortas

Supreme Court Database Detail
SCDB ID 1966-026-04

Return to case listing
  CONTACT   TOP
Modern Data (1946 - 2017) Legacy Data (1791 - 1945) Analysis Results
image The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation. Creative Commons License

washu_logo