Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
Analysis Case Detail
refine this search
Analysis Specifications
Analysis Outcome
Unit of Analysis
n/a
Analysis Case Count
106 (of 7,367 possible records)
Relevant Scope
1954 - 1966
Using Data Release
SCDB_2009_03
Search Reference Code
0903-TIETACK-4785
Analysis
Overview
Issues
Summary
Frequency
Distributions
Crosstab
Reports
Case
Details
Supreme Court Detail
Return to case listing
Case Name
SPEVACK v. KLEIN
LEXIS
|
Westlaw
|
FindLaw
|
CourtListener
Note: FindLaw and CourtListener are free services.
Date Decision
January 16, 1967
Date Argument
November 07, 1966
Decision Type
judgment of the Court (orally argued)
Citations
385 U.S. 511
87 S. Ct. 625
1967 U.S. LEXIS 2504
17 L. Ed. 2d 574
Docket
62
Lower Court Detail
Court in which Case Originated
State Appellate Court
New York
Court whose Decision was Reviewed
State Supreme Court
New York
Petitioner
attorney, or person acting as such;includes bar applicant or law student, or law firm or bar association
Respondent
court or judicial district
New York
Vote Detail
Issue/Legal Provision
(1 of 2)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Self-incrimination (other Than As Pertains To Miranda Or Immunity From Prosecution)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination)
Vote Coalition
5 - 4
Decision Direction
Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Warren
Brennan
special concurrence
Fortas
dissent
Clark
Harlan
Stewart
White
judgment of the Court
Douglas
Issue/Legal Provision
(2 of 2)
ATTORNEYS
Admission To A State Or Federal Bar, Disbarment, And Attorney Discipline (cf. Loyalty Oath: Bar Applicants)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination)
Vote Coalition
5 - 4
Decision Direction
Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Warren
Brennan
special concurrence
Fortas
dissent
Clark
Harlan
Stewart
White
judgment of the Court
Douglas
Supreme Court Database Detail
SCDB ID
1966-039-01
Return to case listing
CONTACT
TOP
Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation.