Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
Analysis Case Detail
refine this search
Analysis Specifications
Analysis Outcome
Unit of Analysis
n/a
Analysis Case Count
106 (of 7,367 possible records)
Relevant Scope
1954 - 1983
Using Data Release
SCDB_2009_03
Search Reference Code
0903-TIETACK-4785
Analysis
Overview
Issues
Summary
Frequency
Distributions
Crosstab
Reports
Case
Details
Supreme Court Detail
Return to case listing
Case Name
SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM et al. v. MINNESOTA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP et al.
LEXIS
|
Westlaw
|
FindLaw
|
CourtListener
Note: FindLaw and CourtListener are free services.
Date Decision
July 05, 1984
Date Argument
April 23, 1984
Decision Type
opinion of the court (orally argued)
Citations
468 U.S. 841
104 S. Ct. 3348
1984 U.S. LEXIS 151
82 L. Ed. 2d 632
Docket
83-276
Lower Court Detail
Court in which Case Originated
Minnesota U.S. District Court
Court whose Decision was Reviewed
Minnesota U.S. District Court
Petitioner
Selective Service System
Respondent
person subject to selective service, including conscientious objector
Vote Detail
Issue/Legal Provision
(1 of 3)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Self-incrimination (other Than As Pertains To Miranda Or Immunity From Prosecution)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Fifth Amendment (self-incrimination)
Vote Coalition
6 - 2
Decision Direction
Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
White
Burger
Rehnquist
Stevens
O'Connor
special concurrence
Powell
dissent
Brennan
Marshall
justice did not participate
Blackmun
Issue/Legal Provision
(2 of 3)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Self-incrimination (other Than As Pertains To Miranda Or Immunity From Prosecution)
CONSTITUTION
Article I, Section 9, Paragraph 3 (bill of attainder or ex post facto law)
Vote Coalition
6 - 2
Decision Direction
Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
White
Burger
Rehnquist
Stevens
O'Connor
special concurrence
Powell
dissent
Brennan
Marshall
justice did not participate
Blackmun
Issue/Legal Provision
(3 of 3)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Self-incrimination (other Than As Pertains To Miranda Or Immunity From Prosecution)
FEDERAL STATUTE
Selective Service, Military Selective Service, or Universal Military Service and Training Acts
Vote Coalition
6 - 2
Decision Direction
Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
White
Burger
Rehnquist
Stevens
O'Connor
special concurrence
Powell
dissent
Brennan
Marshall
justice did not participate
Blackmun
Supreme Court Database Detail
SCDB ID
1983-168-01
Return to case listing
CONTACT
TOP
Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation.