Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
Analysis Case Detail
refine this search
Analysis Specifications
Analysis Outcome
Unit of Analysis
n/a
Analysis Case Count
208 (of 8,245 possible records)
Relevant Scope
1986 - 1989
Using Data Release
SCDB_2011_01
Search Reference Code
1101-POTLUCK-3903
Analysis
Overview
Issues
Summary
Frequency
Distributions
Crosstab
Reports
Case
Details
Supreme Court Detail
Return to case listing
Case Name
AUSTIN, MICHIGAN SECRETARY OF STATE, et al. v. MICHIGAN STATE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LEXIS
|
Westlaw
|
FindLaw
|
CourtListener
Note: FindLaw and CourtListener are free services.
Date Decision
March 27, 1990
Date Argument
October 31, 1989
Decision Type
opinion of the court (orally argued)
Citations
494 U.S. 652
110 S. Ct. 1391
1990 U.S. LEXIS 1665
108 L. Ed. 2d 652
Docket
88-1569
Lower Court Detail
Court in which Case Originated
Michigan Western U.S. District Court
Court whose Decision was Reviewed
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Petitioner
governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
Michigan
Respondent
nonprofit organization or business
Vote Detail
Issue/Legal Provision
(1 of 2)
FIRST AMENDMENT
Campaign Spending (cf. Governmental Corruption):
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
Vote Coalition
6 - 3
Decision Direction
Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
White
Marshall
Blackmun
Rehnquist
regular concurrence
Brennan
Stevens
dissent
O'Connor
Scalia
Kennedy
Issue/Legal Provision
(2 of 2)
FIRST AMENDMENT
Campaign Spending (cf. Governmental Corruption):
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
Vote Coalition
6 - 3
Decision Direction
Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
White
Marshall
Blackmun
Rehnquist
regular concurrence
Brennan
Stevens
dissent
O'Connor
Scalia
Kennedy
Supreme Court Database Detail
SCDB ID
1989-055-01
Return to case listing
CONTACT
TOP
Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation.