Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
Analysis Case Detail
refine this search
Analysis Specifications
Analysis Outcome
Unit of Analysis
n/a
Analysis Case Count
208 (of 8,245 possible records)
Relevant Scope
1986 - 1990
Using Data Release
SCDB_2011_01
Search Reference Code
1101-POTLUCK-3903
Analysis
Overview
Issues
Summary
Frequency
Distributions
Crosstab
Reports
Case
Details
Supreme Court Detail
Return to case listing
Case Name
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND COIS BYRD, SHERIFF OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY v. MCLAUGHLIN, DONALD LEE, et al.
LEXIS
|
Westlaw
|
FindLaw
|
CourtListener
Note: FindLaw and CourtListener are free services.
Date Decision
May 13, 1991
Date Argument
January 07, 1991
Decision Type
opinion of the court (orally argued)
Citations
500 U.S. 44
111 S. Ct. 1661
1991 U.S. LEXIS 2528
114 L. Ed. 2d 49
Docket
89-1817
Lower Court Detail
Court in which Case Originated
California Central U.S. District Court
Court whose Decision was Reviewed
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Petitioner
county government or county governmental unit, except school district
California
Respondent
arrested person, or pretrial detainee
Vote Detail
Issue/Legal Provision
(1 of 2)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Search And Seizure (other Than As Pertains To Vehicles Or Crime Control Act)
CONSTITUTION
Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
Vote Coalition
5 - 4
Decision Direction
Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
White
Rehnquist
O'Connor
Kennedy
Souter
dissent
Marshall
Blackmun
Stevens
Scalia
Issue/Legal Provision
(2 of 2)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Search And Seizure (other Than As Pertains To Vehicles Or Crime Control Act)
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Fourth Amendment
Vote Coalition
5 - 4
Decision Direction
Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
White
Rehnquist
O'Connor
Kennedy
Souter
dissent
Marshall
Blackmun
Stevens
Scalia
Supreme Court Database Detail
SCDB ID
1990-069-01
Return to case listing
CONTACT
TOP
Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation.