Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
Analysis Case Detail
refine this search
Analysis Specifications
Analysis Outcome
Unit of Analysis
n/a
Analysis Case Count
208 (of 8,245 possible records)
Relevant Scope
1986 - 1996
Using Data Release
SCDB_2011_01
Search Reference Code
1101-POTLUCK-3903
Analysis
Overview
Issues
Summary
Frequency
Distributions
Crosstab
Reports
Case
Details
Supreme Court Detail
Return to case listing
Case Name
PAUL SCHENCK AND DWIGHT SAUNDERS v. PRO-CHOICE NETWORK OF WESTERN NEW YORK et al.
LEXIS
|
Westlaw
|
FindLaw
|
CourtListener
Note: FindLaw and CourtListener are free services.
Date Decision
February 19, 1997
Date Argument
October 16, 1996
Decision Type
opinion of the court (orally argued)
Citations
519 U.S. 357
117 S. Ct. 855
1997 U.S. LEXIS 1270
137 L. Ed. 2d 1
Docket
95-1065
Lower Court Detail
Court in which Case Originated
New York Western U.S. District Court
Court whose Decision was Reviewed
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Petitioner
protester, demonstrator, picketer or pamphleteer (non-employment related), or non-indigent loiterer
Respondent
health organization or person, nursing home, medical clinic or laboratory, chiropractor
Vote Detail
Issue/Legal Provision
(1 of 1)
PRIVACY
Abortion: Including Contraceptives
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
Split Vote Issue/Provision
Vote Coalition 1
6 - 3
Decision Direction 1
Liberal
Justice Votes 1
(split-vote)
voted with majority or plurality
Rehnquist
Stevens
O'Connor
Souter
Ginsburg
special concurrence
Breyer
dissent
Scalia
Kennedy
Thomas
Vote Coalition 2
8 - 1
Decision Direction 2
Conservative
Justice Votes 2
(split-vote)
voted with majority or plurality
Rehnquist
Stevens
O'Connor
Souter
Ginsburg
special concurrence
Scalia
Kennedy
Thomas
dissent
Breyer
Supreme Court Database Detail
SCDB ID
1996-024-01
Return to case listing
CONTACT
TOP
Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation.