Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
Analysis Case Detail
refine this search
Analysis Specifications
Analysis Outcome
Unit of Analysis
n/a
Analysis Case Count
82 (of 8,330 possible records)
Relevant Scope
1952 - 1966
Using Data Release
SCDB_2011_03
Search Reference Code
1103-BLUEJAY-8976
Analysis
Overview
Issues
Summary
Frequency
Distributions
Crosstab
Reports
Case
Details
Supreme Court Detail
Return to case listing
Case Name
AFROYIM v. RUSK, SECRETARY OF STATE
LEXIS
|
Westlaw
|
FindLaw
|
CourtListener
Note: FindLaw and CourtListener are free services.
Date Decision
May 29, 1967
Date Argument
February 20, 1967
Decision Type
opinion of the court (orally argued)
Citations
387 U.S. 253
87 S. Ct. 1660
1967 U.S. LEXIS 2844
18 L. Ed. 2d 757
Docket
456
Lower Court Detail
Court in which Case Originated
New York Southern U.S. District Court
Court whose Decision was Reviewed
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Petitioner
alien, person subject to a denaturalization proceeding, or one whose citizenship is revoked
Respondent
Department or Secretary of State
Vote Detail
Issue/Legal Provision
(1 of 2)
CIVIL RIGHTS
Immigration And Naturalization: Loss Of Citizenship, Denaturalization
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Fourteenth Amendment (citizenship clause)
Vote Coalition
5 - 4
Decision Direction
Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Douglas
Warren
Brennan
Fortas
dissent
Clark
Harlan
Stewart
White
Issue/Legal Provision
(2 of 2)
CIVIL RIGHTS
Immigration And Naturalization: Loss Of Citizenship, Denaturalization
FEDERAL STATUTE
Immigration and Naturalization, Immigration, Nationality, or Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Acts, as amended
Vote Coalition
5 - 4
Decision Direction
Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Black
Douglas
Warren
Brennan
Fortas
dissent
Clark
Harlan
Stewart
White
Supreme Court Database Detail
SCDB ID
1966-108-01
Return to case listing
CONTACT
TOP
Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation.