Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
Analysis Case Detail
refine this search
Analysis Specifications
Analysis Outcome
Unit of Analysis
n/a
Analysis Case Count
82 (of 8,330 possible records)
Relevant Scope
1952 - 2000
Using Data Release
SCDB_2011_03
Search Reference Code
1103-BLUEJAY-8976
Analysis
Overview
Issues
Summary
Frequency
Distributions
Crosstab
Reports
Case
Details
Supreme Court Detail
Return to case listing
Case Name
UNITED STATES v. TERRY J. HATTER, JR., JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al.
LEXIS
|
Westlaw
|
FindLaw
|
CourtListener
Note: FindLaw and CourtListener are free services.
Date Decision
May 21, 2001
Date Argument
February 20, 2001
Decision Type
opinion of the court (orally argued)
Citations
532 U.S. 557
121 S. Ct. 1782
2001 U.S. LEXIS 3813
149 L. Ed. 2d 820
Docket
99-1978
Lower Court Detail
Court in which Case Originated
U.S. Court of Claims, Court of Federal Claims
Court whose Decision was Reviewed
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Petitioner
United States
Respondent
judge
United States
Vote Detail
Issue/Legal Provision
(1 of 3)
FEDERAL TAXATION
Federal Taxation, Typically Under Provisions Of The Internal Revenue Code
CONSTITUTION
Article III, Section 1, Paragraph 2 (good behavior and compensation clause of federal judges)
Vote Coalition
5 - 2
Decision Direction
Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Rehnquist
Kennedy
Souter
Ginsburg
Breyer
dissent
Scalia
Thomas
justice did not participate
Stevens
O'Connor
Issue/Legal Provision
(2 of 3)
FEDERAL TAXATION
Federal Taxation, Typically Under Provisions Of The Internal Revenue Code
FEDERAL STATUTE
Social Security, as amended, including Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act
Vote Coalition
5 - 2
Decision Direction
Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Rehnquist
Kennedy
Souter
Ginsburg
Breyer
dissent
Scalia
Thomas
justice did not participate
Stevens
O'Connor
Issue/Legal Provision
(3 of 3)
FEDERAL TAXATION
Federal Taxation, Typically Under Provisions Of The Internal Revenue Code
FEDERAL STATUTE
Medicare provisions of the Social Security Act
Vote Coalition
5 - 2
Decision Direction
Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Rehnquist
Kennedy
Souter
Ginsburg
Breyer
dissent
Scalia
Thomas
justice did not participate
Stevens
O'Connor
Supreme Court Database Detail
SCDB ID
2000-053-01
Return to case listing
CONTACT
TOP
Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation.
