Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
Analysis Case Detail
refine this search
Analysis Specifications
Analysis Outcome
Unit of Analysis
n/a
Analysis Case Count
57 (of 8,407 possible records)
Relevant Scope
1971 - 1974
Using Data Release
SCDB_2012_01
Search Reference Code
1201-HOTSPOT-6773
Analysis
Overview
Issues
Summary
Frequency
Distributions
Crosstab
Reports
Case
Details
Supreme Court Detail
Return to case listing
Case Name
FRY et al. v. UNITED STATES
LEXIS
|
Westlaw
|
FindLaw
|
CourtListener
Note: FindLaw and CourtListener are free services.
Date Decision
May 27, 1975
Date Argument
November 11, 1974
Decision Type
opinion of the court (orally argued)
Citations
421 U.S. 542
95 S. Ct. 1792
1975 U.S. LEXIS 67
44 L. Ed. 2d 363
Docket
73-822
Lower Court Detail
Court in which Case Originated
Ohio Southern U.S. District Court
Court whose Decision was Reviewed
Temporary Emergency U.S. Court of Appeals
Petitioner
governmental employee or job applicant
Ohio
Respondent
United States
Vote Detail
Issue/Legal Provision
(1 of 2)
FEDERALISM
National Supremacy: Miscellaneous
CONSTITUTION
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
Vote Coalition
7 - 1
Decision Direction
Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Brennan
Stewart
White
Marshall
Burger
Blackmun
Powell
dissent
Rehnquist
dissent from a denial or dismissal of certiorari , or dissent from summary affirmation of an appeal
Douglas
Issue/Legal Provision
(2 of 2)
FEDERALISM
National Supremacy: Miscellaneous
INFREQUENTLY LITIGATED STATUTES
Infrequently litigated statutes
12 U.S.C. ยง 1904
Vote Coalition
7 - 1
Decision Direction
Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Brennan
Stewart
White
Marshall
Burger
Blackmun
Powell
dissent
Rehnquist
dissent from a denial or dismissal of certiorari , or dissent from summary affirmation of an appeal
Douglas
Supreme Court Database Detail
SCDB ID
1974-106-01
Return to case listing
CONTACT
TOP
Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation.