wulaw  
image image image image image
image
Modern Data (1946 - 2017) Legacy Data (1791 - 1945) Analysis Results
Analysis Case Detail
Analysis Specifications Analysis Outcome
Unit of Analysis n/a
Analysis Case Count 36 (of 9,805 possible records)
Relevant Scope 2005 - 2010
Using Data Release SCDB_2012_01
Search Reference Code 1201-OVERCOAT-4151
Analysis
Overview
Issues
Summary
Frequency
Distributions
Crosstab
Reports
Case
Details
         
Supreme Court Detail
Case Name
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., PETITIONERS v. MICHAEL B. WHITING ET AL
LEXIS | Westlaw | FindLaw | CourtListener
Note: FindLaw and CourtListener are free services.
Date Decision May 26, 2011
Date Argument December 08, 2010
Decision Type opinion of the court (orally argued)
Citations 131 S. Ct. 1968
2011 U.S. LEXIS 4018
179 L. Ed. 2d 1031
Docket 09-115

Lower Court Detail
Court in which Case Originated Arizona U.S. District Court
Court whose Decision was Reviewed U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Petitioner professional organization, business, or person
Respondent governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
Arizona

Vote Detail
Issue/Legal Provision
(1 of 2)
FEDERALISM
Federal Pre-emption Of State Legislation Or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation Of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless The Court Says It Does.
FEDERAL STATUTE
Immigration and Naturalization, Immigration, Nationality, or Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Acts, as amended
Vote Coalition 5 - 3
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Scalia
Kennedy
Thomas
Roberts
Alito
dissent
Ginsburg
Breyer
Sotomayor
justice did not participate
Kagan
Issue/Legal Provision
(2 of 2)
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
State Or Local Government Regulation, Especially Of Business (cf. Federal Pre-emption Of State Court Jurisdiction, Federal Pre-emption Of State Legislation Or Regulation)
STATE OR LOCAL LAW OR REGULATION
State or Local Law Regulation
Vote Coalition 5 - 3
Decision Direction Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Scalia
Kennedy
Thomas
Roberts
Alito
dissent
Ginsburg
Breyer
Sotomayor
justice did not participate
Kagan

Supreme Court Database Detail
SCDB ID 2010-047-01

Return to case listing
  CONTACT   TOP
Modern Data (1946 - 2017) Legacy Data (1791 - 1945) Analysis Results
image The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation. Creative Commons License

washu_logo