Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
Analysis Case Detail
refine this search
Analysis Specifications
Analysis Outcome
Unit of Analysis
n/a
Analysis Case Count
36 (of 9,805 possible records)
Relevant Scope
2005 - 2011
Using Data Release
SCDB_2012_01
Search Reference Code
1201-OVERCOAT-4151
Analysis
Overview
Issues
Summary
Frequency
Distributions
Crosstab
Reports
Case
Details
Supreme Court Detail
Return to case listing
Case Name
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., PETITIONERS v. FLORIDA et al.
LEXIS
|
Westlaw
|
FindLaw
|
CourtListener
Note: FindLaw and CourtListener are free services.
Date Decision
June 28, 2012
Date Argument
March 26, 2012
Decision Type
opinion of the court (orally argued)
Citations
132 S. Ct. 2566
2012 U.S. LEXIS 4876
183 L. Ed. 2d 450
Docket
11-398
Lower Court Detail
Court in which Case Originated
Florida Northern U.S. District Court
Court whose Decision was Reviewed
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Petitioner
Department or Secretary of Health and Human Services
Respondent
State
Florida
Vote Detail
Issue/Legal Provision
(1 of 3)
FEDERALISM
National Supremacy: Miscellaneous
CONSTITUTION
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 1 (taxing, spending, general welfare, or uniformity clause)
Vote Coalition
5 - 4
Decision Direction
Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Roberts
regular concurrence
Ginsburg
Breyer
Sotomayor
Kagan
dissent
Scalia
Kennedy
Thomas
Alito
Issue/Legal Provision
(2 of 3)
FEDERALISM
National Supremacy: Miscellaneous
CONSTITUTION
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
Vote Coalition
5 - 4
Decision Direction
Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Roberts
special concurrence
Scalia
Kennedy
Thomas
Alito
dissent
Ginsburg
Breyer
Sotomayor
Kagan
Issue/Legal Provision
(3 of 3)
FEDERALISM
National Supremacy: Miscellaneous
CONSTITUTION
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 1 (taxing, spending, general welfare, or uniformity clause)
Split Vote Issue/Provision
Vote Coalition 1
5 - 4
Decision Direction 1
Liberal
Justice Votes 1
(split-vote)
voted with majority or plurality
Roberts
regular concurrence
Ginsburg
Breyer
Sotomayor
Kagan
dissent
Scalia
Kennedy
Thomas
Alito
Vote Coalition 2
7 - 2
Decision Direction 2
Conservative
Justice Votes 2
(split-vote)
voted with majority or plurality
Breyer
Roberts
Kagan
special concurrence
Scalia
Kennedy
Thomas
Alito
dissent
Ginsburg
Sotomayor
Supreme Court Database Detail
SCDB ID
2011-077-03
Return to case listing
CONTACT
TOP
Modern Data (1946 - 2017)
Legacy Data (1791 - 1945)
Analysis Results
The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation.
